The kernel seq_read() helper function expects ->next() to update
the passed position even there are no more entries. Failure to
do so results in the following warning being logged.
seq_file: buggy .next function procfs_list_seq_next [spl]
did not update position index
Functionally there is no issue with the way procfs_list_seq_next()
is implemented and the warning is harmless. However, we want to
silence this some what scary incorrect warning. This commit
updates the Linux procfs code to advance the position even for
the last entry.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#10984Closes#10996
e23ba78bd8