Updated fix to detect if we are in an interrupt and only sleep if it
is safe to do some. I guess it must be safe to sleep under Solaris
this must be handled in a sort interrupt handler there
Additional minor memory related tweak to move certain large allocations
to virtual memory and in one case to simply suppress the warning message
since it is not that far over the warning limit.
Upstream they modified the ioctl code so we need to make similiar
updates since we modify the API ourselves to always pass a pointer
to file pointer around. This allows us to track per file handle
state which is used by the zevent code.
The ZVOL interfaces changed significantly with the latest update. I've
updated the Linux version of the code to handle this and it looks like
the net result has been a simpler implementation which is good! Plus,
I'm relatively sure the ZIL integration is right this time although it
needs some serious crash testing to verify that.
Also minor additions to vdev_disk for .hold and .rele callbacks.
Currently, they do nothing and I may be able to simply stub them out
with NULLs for Linux since opening the device in Linux should have
much the same effort. More investigation is needed though since
the ZFS interface may make some demands here I'm overlooking.
After such a large update many of the symbols which were previously
exported are no longer available, and several new symbols have been
added and are needed. Refresh to topic branch to reflect this.
The DMU API has been modified to remove the dmu_objset_open, and
dmu_objset_close functions. Now you must explicitly *_create an
objset, then *_own it, *_disown it when not in use, and *_destroy
it when your through. All and all I like the API much better.
Additionally, while I was here I moved the zpios_cmd_t off the
stack because previous analysis showed it was very stack heavy.
Almost exclusively this patch handled the addition of another char
array to the zfs_cmd_t structure. Unfortunately c90 doesn't allow
zero filling the entire struct with the '= { 0 };' shorthand.
Originally these changes were on other gcc-* topic branches but
because c90 touches the same bit of code and I'd like to keep all
the gcc-* branches completely parallel I've moved these few bits
over here. This is one of the downsides of not just having one
big patch stack.
Brian Behlendorf