Commit Graph

2348 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Brian Behlendorf 3a431c68c2 Remove LINUXINCLUDE from autoconf wrapper, breaks 2.6.28+ kernels.
Modern kernel build systems at least post 2.6.16 will set this properly
so we should not.  In fact post 2.6.28 the include headers have moved
under arch so the guess we make here is completely wrong.  Letting
the kernel build system set this ensure it will be correct.  Also
drop the ulimit from the Makefile which, not surprisingly, turns out
to be very non-portable.  If your expecting failures set the ulimit
in your shell before kicking off the test suite.
2009-07-27 10:39:28 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 18ffe73d3f Check arch/default/ path when detecting kernel objects on SLES
We still preferentially use arch/arch looking for a native version
but if that fails it is acceptable to use default.
2009-07-24 16:26:17 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 5ecd180d91 ulimit is a function of the shell and should be invoked as such. 2009-07-24 15:50:57 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf db3967ba86 Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/zfs-branch' into zfs-branch 2009-07-24 11:08:43 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 9a2275c1c5 Merge branch 'feature-branch' into refs/top-bases/zfs-branch 2009-07-24 11:08:42 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 77901ca759 Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/feature-branch' into feature-branch 2009-07-24 11:08:41 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 0435a79314 Merge branch 'feature-pthreads' into refs/top-bases/feature-branch 2009-07-24 11:08:40 -07:00
Ricardo M. Correia 51760e3c7e Change VERIFY() into VERIFY3U() when creating threads in ztest, so that we can see the return code when it fails.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
2009-07-24 11:00:23 -07:00
Ricardo M. Correia 08d148d418 Add ulimit -c unlimited before running ztest, to get a core dump.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
2009-07-24 10:58:55 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 710c21f2e9 Use LOSETUP variable for all calls to /sbin/losetup 2009-07-24 10:25:01 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 82ca18caae Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/zfs-branch' into zfs-branch 2009-07-24 09:15:56 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 825c086a4e Merge branch 'fix-branch' into refs/top-bases/zfs-branch 2009-07-24 09:15:55 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 4a4280c0f7 Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/fix-branch' into fix-branch 2009-07-24 09:15:54 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf e4610d7991 Merge branch 'fix-get-configs' into refs/top-bases/fix-branch 2009-07-24 09:15:53 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 1b4dfb80fb Increase buffer size for nvlist for large configurations
It's still not clear to me why the default value here is large
enough Solaris.  I hit this limit again when setting up 120 SATA
drives configured as 15 raidz2 groups each containing 8 drives.
We expect to go bigger so we may just want to spend a little
time and figure out how to make this all dynamic.
2009-07-24 08:53:18 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf bc8c87d2f3 Missed one instance of losetup -f to unused_loop_device change 2009-07-21 17:05:13 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf b9c3c7a2f4 The losetup -f option is unavailable for SLES10 use unused_loop_device()
SLES10 ships util-linux-2.12r-35.30 which does not support the -f option
to losetup.  To avoid this problem the unused_loop_device() function was
added which attempts to find an unused loop device by checking each
/dev/loop* device with losetup to see if it is configured.
2009-07-21 16:17:54 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 5753d78dcd Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/zfs-branch' into zfs-branch 2009-07-14 16:49:29 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf e9d7526fb3 Merge branch 'feature-branch' into refs/top-bases/zfs-branch 2009-07-14 16:49:27 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 407a09cf3e Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/feature-branch' into feature-branch 2009-07-14 16:49:23 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 8d55cf8c97 Merge branch 'feature-pthreads' into refs/top-bases/feature-branch 2009-07-14 16:49:22 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 5ef898a106 Update TODO by removing out of date failure modes.
From what I've seen so far the pthreads cleanup has addressed
most/all of the pthread_* related crashes in ztest.
2009-07-14 16:36:28 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf a13cdecdd2 Remove debug printf 2009-07-14 16:35:13 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf fef9a2c571 Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/zfs-branch' into zfs-branch 2009-07-14 14:34:39 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 9b9f17a585 Merge branch 'feature-branch' into refs/top-bases/zfs-branch 2009-07-14 14:34:37 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 6923d172c5 Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/feature-branch' into feature-branch 2009-07-14 14:34:36 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 605a501311 Merge branch 'feature-pthreads' into refs/top-bases/feature-branch 2009-07-14 14:34:35 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 864e44e7e0 Provide correct kthread API semantics using pthreads.
The intent here is to fully remove the previous Solaris thread
implementation so we don't need to simulate both Solaris kernel
and user space thread APIs.  The few user space consumers of the
thread API have been updated to use the kthread API.  In order
to support this we needed to more fully support the kthread API
and that means not doing crazy things like casting a thread id
to a pointer and using that as was done before.  This first
implementation is not effecient but it does provide all the
corrent semantics.  If/when performance becomes and issue we
can and should just natively adopt pthreads which is portable.

Let me finish by saying I'm not proud of any of this and I would
love to see it improved.  However, this slow implementation does
at least provide all the correct kthread API semantics whereas
the previous method of casting the thread ID to a pointer was
dodgy at best.
2009-07-14 14:16:26 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf e16ffab302 SPLBUILD now includes modules 2009-07-10 11:37:30 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 4baa59ce44 Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/zfs-branch' into zfs-branch 2009-07-10 10:50:13 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf cfec48619c Merge branch 'gcc-branch' into refs/top-bases/zfs-branch 2009-07-10 10:50:12 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 1817377ecd Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/gcc-branch' into gcc-branch 2009-07-10 10:50:11 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 84b52133f3 Merge branch 'gcc-unused' into refs/top-bases/gcc-branch 2009-07-10 10:50:10 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf f3c55459b0 Pull ; in to macro to ensure it get's entirely removed, C90 issue. 2009-07-10 10:40:55 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 24662d61d9 Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/zfs-branch' into zfs-branch 2009-07-09 15:08:06 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 2f4e745a09 Merge branch 'gcc-branch' into refs/top-bases/zfs-branch 2009-07-09 15:08:04 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 893e11c6be Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/gcc-branch' into gcc-branch 2009-07-09 15:08:03 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf bed14af385 Merge branch 'gcc-no-parenthesis' into refs/top-bases/gcc-branch 2009-07-09 15:08:03 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf ae132945b4 Add suggested paranthesis. 2009-07-09 14:59:10 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 17d368fa5f Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/zfs-branch' into zfs-branch 2009-07-09 13:17:27 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf a3bc97c2c3 Merge branch 'gcc-branch' into refs/top-bases/zfs-branch 2009-07-09 13:17:26 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 947db84a82 Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/gcc-branch' into gcc-branch 2009-07-09 13:17:25 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 9ad0fef49e Merge branch 'gcc-uninit' into refs/top-bases/gcc-branch
Conflicts:

	module/nvpair/nvpair.c
2009-07-09 13:08:30 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 683b2f0d00 TopGit missed this update when I updated the same line in the
gcc-unused and gcc-uninit topic branches at the same time and
then ran 'tg update'.  I'll need to keep that sort of thing
in mind when updating multiple topic branches between updates.
2009-07-09 13:07:05 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf c4c4afd8fd Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/zfs-branch' into zfs-branch 2009-07-09 12:23:41 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 6db8882b78 Merge branch 'gcc-branch' into refs/top-bases/zfs-branch 2009-07-09 12:23:39 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 14445eaa8e Merge commit 'refs/top-bases/gcc-branch' into gcc-branch 2009-07-09 12:23:37 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 76bf02aebb Merge branch 'gcc-unused' into refs/top-bases/gcc-branch 2009-07-09 12:23:36 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf 076406cfe3 Merge branch 'gcc-uninit' into refs/top-bases/gcc-branch 2009-07-09 12:23:35 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf a551134b2f Unitialized variables should be handled in the gcc-uninit topic branch. 2009-07-09 12:14:56 -07:00