This resolves previous scalabily concerns about the cost of calling
curthread which previously required a list walk. The kthread address
is now tracked as thread specific data which can be quickly returned.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
The 2.6.30 kernel build systems sets -Wframe-larger-than=2048 which causes
a warning to be generated when an individual stack frame exceeds 2048.
This caught the spa_history_log() and dmu_objset_snapshot() functions
which declared a data structure on the stack which contained a char
array of MAXPATHLEN. This in defined to be 4096 in the linux kernel
and I imagine it is quite large under Solaris as well. Regardless, the
offending data structures were moved to the heap to correctly keep the
stack depth to a minimum. We might consider setting this value even
lower to catch additional offenders because we are expecting deep stacks.
The intent here is to fully remove the previous Solaris thread
implementation so we don't need to simulate both Solaris kernel
and user space thread APIs. The few user space consumers of the
thread API have been updated to use the kthread API. In order
to support this we needed to more fully support the kthread API
and that means not doing crazy things like casting a thread id
to a pointer and using that as was done before. This first
implementation is not effecient but it does provide all the
corrent semantics. If/when performance becomes and issue we
can and should just natively adopt pthreads which is portable.
Let me finish by saying I'm not proud of any of this and I would
love to see it improved. However, this slow implementation does
at least provide all the correct kthread API semantics whereas
the previous method of casting the thread ID to a pointer was
dodgy at best.
gcc-unused and gcc-uninit topic branches at the same time and
then ran 'tg update'. I'll need to keep that sort of thing
in mind when updating multiple topic branches between updates.
within an ASSERT with the ASSERTV macro which will ensure it will
be removed when the ASSERTs are commented out. This makes gcc much
happier, makes the variables usage explicit, and removes the need
for the compiler to detect it is unused and do the right thing.
Brian Behlendorf
Ricardo M. Correia