These macros are similar to VERIFY0() and ASSERT0() but are intended
for pointers, and therefore use uintptr_t instead of int64_t.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Signed-off-by: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@FreeBSD.org>
Closes#15225
Chiefly:
- Remove unnecessary parentheses around variable names.
- Remove spaces between the type and variable in casts.
- Make the panic message for VERIFY0() reflect how the macro is used.
- Use %p to format pointers, except in Linux kernel code.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Signed-off-by: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@FreeBSD.org>
Closes#15225
The previous version reported all the right info, but the VERIFY3 name
made a little more confusing when looking for the matching location in
the source code.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu>
Signed-off-by: Rob N ★ <robn@despairlabs.com>
Closes#14099
The use of __noreturn__ in 55d7afa4ad on
spl_panic() caused objtool warnings on Linux when the kernel is built
with CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=y. This patch works around that by
restricting the application of __noreturn__ to builds for static
analyzers.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu>
Closes#14068
Both Clang's Static Analyzer and Synopsys' Coverity would ignore
assertions. Following Clang's advice, we annotate our assertions:
https://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/annotations.html#custom_assertions
This makes both Clang's Static Analyzer and Coverity properly identify
assertions. This change reduced Clang's reported defects from 246 to
180. It also reduced the false positives reported by Coverityi by 10,
while enabling Coverity to find 9 more defects that previously were
false negatives.
A couple examples of this would be CID-1524417 and CID-1524423. After
submitting a build to coverity with the modified assertions, CID-1524417
disappeared while the report for CID-1524423 no longer claimed that the
assertion tripped.
Coincidentally, it turns out that it is possible to more accurately
annotate our headers than the Coverity modelling file permits in the
case of format strings. Since we can do that and this patch annotates
headers whenever `__coverity_panic__()` would have been used in the
model file, we drop all models that use `__coverity_panic__()` from the
model file.
Upon seeing the success in eliminating false positives involving
assertions, it occurred to me that we could also modify our headers to
eliminate coverity's false positives involving byte swaps. We now have
coverity specific byteswap macros, that do nothing, to disable
Coverity's false positives when we do byte swaps. This allowed us to
also drop the byteswap definitions from the model file.
Lastly, a model file update has been done beyond the mentioned
deletions:
* The definitions of `umem_alloc_aligned()`, `umem_alloc()` andi
`umem_zalloc()` were originally implemented in a way that was
intended to inform coverity that when KM_SLEEP has been passed these
functions, they do not return NULL. A small error in how this was
done was found, so we correct it.
* Definitions for umem_cache_alloc() and umem_cache_free() have been
added.
In practice, no false positives were avoided by making these changes,
but in the interest of correctness from future coverity builds, we make
them anyway.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu>
Closes#13902
69 CSTYLED BEGINs remain, appx. 30 of which can be removed if cstyle(1)
had a useful policy regarding
CALL(ARG1,
ARG2,
ARG3);
above 2 lines. As it stands, it spits out *both*
sysctl_os.c: 385: continuation line should be indented by 4 spaces
sysctl_os.c: 385: indent by spaces instead of tabs
which is very cool
Another >10 could be fixed by removing "ulong" &al. handling.
I don't foresee anyone actually using it intentionally
(does it even exist in modern headers? why did it in the first place?).
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Closes#12993
This led to these two warning types:
debug.h:139:67: warning: the address of ‘ARC_anon’
will always evaluate as ‘true’ [-Waddress]
139 | #define ASSERT3P(x, y, z)
((void) sizeof (!!(x)), (void) sizeof (!!(z)))
| ^
arc.c:1591:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘ASSERT3P’
1591 | ASSERT3P(hdr->b_l1hdr.b_state, ==, arc_anon);
| ^~~~~~~~
and
arc.h:66:44: warning: ‘<<’ in boolean context,
did you mean ‘<’? [-Wint-in-bool-context]
66 | #define HDR_GET_LSIZE(hdr)
((hdr)->b_lsize << SPA_MINBLOCKSHIFT)
debug.h:138:46: note: in definition of macro ‘ASSERT3U’
138 | #define ASSERT3U(x, y, z)
((void) sizeof (!!(x)), (void) sizeof (!!(z)))
| ^
arc.c:1760:12: note: in expansion of macro ‘HDR_GET_LSIZE’
1760 | ASSERT3U(HDR_GET_LSIZE(hdr), !=, 0);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Closes#13009
sizeof(bitfield.member) is invalid, and this shows up in some FreeBSD
build configurations: work around this by !!ing ‒
this makes the sizeof target the ! result type (_Bool), instead
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Fixes: 42aaf0e ("libspl: ASSERT*: mark arguments as used")
Closes#12984Closes#12986
Add branch hints and constify the intermediate evaluations of
left/right params in VERIFY3*().
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Adam Moss <c@yotes.com>
Closes#11708
Add the FreeBSD platform code to the OpenZFS repository. As of this
commit the source can be compiled and tested on FreeBSD 11 and 12.
Subsequent commits are now required to compile on FreeBSD and Linux.
Additionally, they must pass the ZFS Test Suite on FreeBSD which is
being run by the CI. As of this commit 1230 tests pass on FreeBSD
and there are no unexpected failures.
Reviewed-by: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
Reviewed-by: Richard Laager <rlaager@wiktel.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Closes#898Closes#8987
Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Rob N ★
Richard Yao
наб
Adam D. Moss
Matthew Macy