After spending considerable time thinking about this I've come to the
conclusion that on Linux systems we don't need Solaris style devid
support. Instead was can simply use udev if we are careful, there
are even some advantages.
The Solaris style devid's are designed to provide a mechanism by which
a device can be opened reliably regardless of it's location in the system.
This is exactly what udev provides us on Linux, a flexible mechanism for
consistently identifing the same devices regardless of probing order.
We just need to be careful to always open the device by the path provided
at creation time, this path must be stored in ZPOOL_CONFIG_PATH. This
in fact has certain advantages.
For example, if in your system you always want the zpool to be able to
locate the disk regardless of physical location you can create the pool
using /dev/disk/by-id/. This is perhaps what you'ld want on a desktop
system where the exact location is not that important. It's more
critical that all the disks can be found.
However, in an enterprise setup there's a good chace that the physical
location of each drive is important. You have like set things up such
that your raid groups span multiple hosts adapters, such that you can
lose an adapter without downtime. In this case you would want to use
the /dev/disk/by-path/ path to ensure the path information is preserved
and you always open the disks at the right physical locations. This
would ensure your system never gets accidently misconfigured and still
just works because the zpool was still able to locate the disk.
Finally, if you want to get really fancy you can always create your
own udev rules. This way you could implement whatever lookup sceme
you wanted in user space for your drives. This would include nice
cosmetic things like being able to control the device names in tools
like zpool status, since the name as just based of the device names.
I've yet to come up with a good reason to implement devid support on
Linux since we have udev. But I've still just commented it out for now
because somebody might come up with a really good I forgot.
The major change here is to fix up libefi to be linux aware. For
the most part this wasn't too hard but there were a few major issues.
First off I needed to handle the DKIOCGMEDIAINFO and DKIOCINFO ioctls.
There is no direct equivilant for these ioctls under linux. To handle
this I added wrapper functions which under Solaris simple call the ioctls.
But under Linux dig around the system a little bit getting the needed
info to fill in the requested structures.
Secondly the efi_ioctl() call was adapted such that under linux it directly
read or writes out the partition table. Under Solaris this work was
handed off to the kernel via an ioctl. In the efi_write() case we also
ensure we prompt the kernel via BLKRRPART to re-scan the new partition
table. The libefi generated partition tables are correct but older
versions of ~parted-1.8.1 can not read them without a small patch.
The kernel and fdisk are able to read them just fine.
Thirdly efi_alloc_and_init() which is used by zpool to determine if a
device is a 'wholedisk' was updated to be linux aware. This check is
performed by using the partition number for the device, which the
partition number is 0 on linux it is a 'wholedisk'. However, certain
device type such as the loopback and ram disks needed to be excluded
because they do not support partitioning.
Forthly the zpool command was made symlink aware so it can correctly
resolve udev entries such as /dev/disk/by-*/*. This symlinks are
fully expanded ensuring all block devices are recognized. When a
when a 'wholedisk' block device is detected we now properly write
out an efi label and place zfs in the first partition (0th slice).
This partition is created 1MiB in to the disk to ensure it is aligned
nicely with all high end block devices I'm aware of.
This all works for me now but it did take quite a bit of work to get
it all sorted out. It would not surprise me if certain special cases
were missed so we should keep any eye of for any odd behavior.
The previous code was not wrong, but this prevents gcc from warning
us about missing cases for these known safe switch statements. The
-Wno-missing-cases can now be removed to detect places where we
accidentally forgot a case.
Brian Behlendorf