A rangelock KPI already exists on FreeBSD. Add a zfs_ prefix as
per our convention to prevent any conflict with existing symbols.
Reviewed-by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org>
Closes#9402
The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific
data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by
the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range
locking code.
We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic
and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by
future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as
well as the kernel.
Porting notes:
* Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h.
* Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync().
This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t.
* Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit
check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes
which has not been merged to illumos.
* Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally
needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately
after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but
if not we may need to reintroduce this logic.
* Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in
to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689.
- d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state
- e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks
* Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the
rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting
for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their
reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition
variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex
can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to
defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is
released.
Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com>
Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689
OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680
External-issue: DLPX-58662
Closes#7980
The use of zfs_sb_t instead of zfsvfs_t results in unnecessary
conflicts with the upstream source. Change all instances of
zfs_sb_t to zfsvfs_t including updating the variables names.
Whenever possible the code was updated to be consistent with
hope it appears in the upstream OpenZFS source.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
The zfs range lock interface no longer tightly depends on a
znode_t and therefore can be used in ztest. This allows the
previous ztest specific implementation to be removed, and for
additional test coverage of the shared version.
Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <david.chen@osnexus.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Protopopov <boris.protopopov@actifio.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Issue #4023
Issue #4024
struct zvol_state contains a dummy znode, which is around 1KB on x64,
only for zfs_range_lock. But in reality, other than z_range_lock and
z_range_avl, zfs_range_lock only need znode on regular file, which
means we add 1KB on a structure and gain nothing.
In this patch, we remove the dummy znode for zvol_state. In order to
do that, we also need to refactor zfs_range_lock a bit. We move
z_range_lock and z_range_avl pair out of znode_t to form zfs_rlock_t.
This new struct replaces znode_t as the main handle inside the range
lock functions.
We also add pointers to z_size, z_blksz, and z_max_blksz so range lock
code doesn't depend on znode_t. This allows non-ZPL consumers like
Lustre to use the range locks with their equivalent znode_t structure.
Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <david.chen@osnexus.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Protopopov <boris.protopopov@actifio.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#4510
3742 zfs comments need cleaner, more consistent style
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Eric Schrock <eric.schrock@delphix.com>
Approved by: Christopher Siden <christopher.siden@delphix.com>
References:
https://www.illumos.org/issues/3742illumos/illumos-gate@f717074149
Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Issue #1775
Porting notes:
1. The change to zfs_vfsops.c was dropped because it involves
zfs_mount_label_policy, which does not exist in the Linux port.
The original range lock implementation had to be modified by commit
8926ab7 because it was unsafe on Linux. In particular, calling
cv_destroy() immediately after cv_broadcast() is dangerous because
the waiters may still be asleep. Thus the following cv_destroy()
will free memory which may still be in use.
This was fixed by updating cv_destroy() to block on waiters but
this in turn introduced a deadlock. The deadlock was resolved
with the use of a taskq to move the offending free outside the
range lock. This worked well but using the taskq for the free
resulted in a serious performace hit. This is somewhat ironic
because at the time I felt using the taskq might improve things
by making the free asynchronous.
This patch refines the original fix and moves the free from the
taskq to a private free list. Then items which must be free'd
are simply inserted in to the list. When the range lock is dropped
it's safe to free the items. The list is walked and all rl_t
entries are freed.
This change improves small cached read performance by 26x. This
was expected because for small reads the number of locking calls
goes up significantly. More surprisingly this change significantly
improves large cache read performance. This probably attributable
to better cpu/memory locality. Very likely the same processor
which allocated the memory is now freeing it.
bs ext3 zfs zfs+fix faster
----------------------------------------------
512 435 3 79 26x
1k 820 7 160 22x
2k 1536 14 305 21x
4k 2764 28 572 20x
8k 3788 50 1024 20x
16k 4300 86 1843 21x
32k 4505 138 2560 18x
64k 5324 252 3891 15x
128k 5427 276 4710 17x
256k 5427 413 5017 12x
512k 5427 497 5324 10x
1m 5427 521 5632 10x
Closes#142
One of the neat tricks an autoconf style project is capable of
is allow configurion/building in a directory other than the
source directory. The major advantage to this is that you can
build the project various different ways while making changes
in a single source tree.
For example, this project is designed to work on various different
Linux distributions each of which work slightly differently. This
means that changes need to verified on each of those supported
distributions perferably before the change is committed to the
public git repo.
Using nfs and custom build directories makes this much easier.
I now have a single source tree in nfs mounted on several different
systems each running a supported distribution. When I make a
change to the source base I suspect may break things I can
concurrently build from the same source on all the systems each
in their own subdirectory.
wget -c http://github.com/downloads/behlendorf/zfs/zfs-x.y.z.tar.gz
tar -xzf zfs-x.y.z.tar.gz
cd zfs-x-y-z
------------------------- run concurrently ----------------------
<ubuntu system> <fedora system> <debian system> <rhel6 system>
mkdir ubuntu mkdir fedora mkdir debian mkdir rhel6
cd ubuntu cd fedora cd debian cd rhel6
../configure ../configure ../configure ../configure
make make make make
make check make check make check make check
This change also moves many of the include headers from individual
incude/sys directories under the modules directory in to a single
top level include directory. This has the advantage of making
the build rules cleaner and logically it makes a bit more sense.
Matthew Macy
Matt Ahrens
Brian Behlendorf
Boris Protopopov
Chunwei Chen
Will Andrews