While I completely agree the udev is the lesser of many possibles
evils when solving the device issue... it is still evil. After
attempting to craft a single rule which will work for various
versions of udev in various distros. I've come to the conclusion
the only maintainable way to solve this issue is to split the rule
from any particular configuration.
This commit provides a generic 60-zpool.rules file which use a
small helper util 'zpool_id' to parse a configuration file by
default located in /etc/zfs/zdev.conf. The helper script maps
a by-path udev name to a more friendly name of <channel><rank>
for large configurations.
As part of this change all of the support scripts why rely on
this udev naming convention have been updated as needed. Example
zdev.conf files have also been added for 3 different systems by
you will always need to add one for your exact hardware.
Finally, included in these changes are the proper tweaks to the
build system to ensure everything still get's packaged properly
in the rpms and can run in or out of tree.
This include updating all the Makefile.am to have the correct
include paths and libraries. In addition, the zlib m4 macro was
updated to more correctly integrate with the Makefiles. And I
added two new macros libblkid and libuuid which will be needed by
subsequent commits for blkid and uuid support respectively. The
blkid support is optional, the uuid support is mandatory for libefi.
Under FC11 rpm builds by default add the --fortify-source option which
ensures that functions flagged with certain attributes must have their
return codes checked. Normally this is just a warning but we always
build with -Werror so this is fatal. Simply wrap the function in a
verify call to ensure we catch a failure if there is one.
With this patch applied I get the following failure 100% of the time,
I'd prefer to debug it and keep moving forward but I do not have the
time right now so I'm reverting the patch to the version which worked.
Ricardo please fix.
(gdb) bt
0 ztest_dmu_write_parallel (za=0x2aaaac898960) at
../../cmd/ztest/ztest.c:2566
1 0x0000000000405a79 in ztest_thread (arg=<value optimized out>)
at ../../cmd/ztest/ztest.c:3862
2 0x00002b2e6a7a841d in zk_thread_helper (arg=<value optimized out>)
at ../../lib/libzpool/kernel.c:131
3 0x000000379be06367 in start_thread (arg=<value optimized out>)
at pthread_create.c:297
4 0x000000379b2d30ad in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
This resolves previous scalabily concerns about the cost of calling
curthread which previously required a list walk. The kthread address
is now tracked as thread specific data which can be quickly returned.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
The intent here is to fully remove the previous Solaris thread
implementation so we don't need to simulate both Solaris kernel
and user space thread APIs. The few user space consumers of the
thread API have been updated to use the kthread API. In order
to support this we needed to more fully support the kthread API
and that means not doing crazy things like casting a thread id
to a pointer and using that as was done before. This first
implementation is not effecient but it does provide all the
corrent semantics. If/when performance becomes and issue we
can and should just natively adopt pthreads which is portable.
Let me finish by saying I'm not proud of any of this and I would
love to see it improved. However, this slow implementation does
at least provide all the correct kthread API semantics whereas
the previous method of casting the thread ID to a pointer was
dodgy at best.
within an ASSERT with the ASSERTV macro which will ensure it will
be removed when the ASSERTs are commented out. This makes gcc much
happier, makes the variables usage explicit, and removes the need
for the compiler to detect it is unused and do the right thing.
This is exactly the reason why I want a new topgit command which
takes the base, then incrementally applies all the patches and
compares them againsts what is actually committed. This would
ensure this sort of thing doesn't happen!
code to only use the kthread API regardless of if it is compiled in the
kernel or user space. The kthread API will be layered on top of pthreads
as best as possible in zfs_context, this is non optimal but much clearer.
Brian Behlendorf
Ricardo M. Correia