Enhance a dmu_tx_dirty_buf() assertion
The following assertion is good to validate the correctness of new DMU consumers, but it doesn't quite provide enough information. Slightly rework the assertion so that when it is hit the actual offending values will be included in the output. SPLError: 4787:0:(dmu_tx.c:828:dmu_tx_dirty_buf()) ASSERTION(dn == NULL || dn->dn_assigned_txg == tx->tx_txg) failed Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4b5d425f14
commit
99ea23c583
|
@ -808,6 +808,7 @@ dmu_tx_dirty_buf(dmu_tx_t *tx, dmu_buf_impl_t *db)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
DB_DNODE_ENTER(db);
|
DB_DNODE_ENTER(db);
|
||||||
dn = DB_DNODE(db);
|
dn = DB_DNODE(db);
|
||||||
|
ASSERT(dn != NULL);
|
||||||
ASSERT(tx->tx_txg != 0);
|
ASSERT(tx->tx_txg != 0);
|
||||||
ASSERT(tx->tx_objset == NULL || dn->dn_objset == tx->tx_objset);
|
ASSERT(tx->tx_objset == NULL || dn->dn_objset == tx->tx_objset);
|
||||||
ASSERT3U(dn->dn_object, ==, db->db.db_object);
|
ASSERT3U(dn->dn_object, ==, db->db.db_object);
|
||||||
|
@ -825,7 +826,7 @@ dmu_tx_dirty_buf(dmu_tx_t *tx, dmu_buf_impl_t *db)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for (txh = list_head(&tx->tx_holds); txh;
|
for (txh = list_head(&tx->tx_holds); txh;
|
||||||
txh = list_next(&tx->tx_holds, txh)) {
|
txh = list_next(&tx->tx_holds, txh)) {
|
||||||
ASSERT(dn == NULL || dn->dn_assigned_txg == tx->tx_txg);
|
ASSERT3U(dn->dn_assigned_txg, ==, tx->tx_txg);
|
||||||
if (txh->txh_dnode == dn && txh->txh_type != THT_NEWOBJECT)
|
if (txh->txh_dnode == dn && txh->txh_type != THT_NEWOBJECT)
|
||||||
match_object = TRUE;
|
match_object = TRUE;
|
||||||
if (txh->txh_dnode == NULL || txh->txh_dnode == dn) {
|
if (txh->txh_dnode == NULL || txh->txh_dnode == dn) {
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue