Skip FREEOBJECTS for objects which can't exist

When sending an incremental stream based on a snapshot, the receiving
side must have the same base snapshot.  Thus we do not need to send
FREEOBJECTS records for any objects past the maximum one which exists
locally.

This allows us to send incremental streams (again) to older ZFS
implementations (e.g. ZoL < 0.7) which actually try to free all objects
in a FREEOBJECTS record, instead of bailing out early.

Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Closes #5699
Closes #6507
Closes #6616
This commit is contained in:
Fabian Grünbichler 2017-09-26 14:03:21 +02:00 committed by Tony Hutter
parent b544fe4123
commit 8d688ce66a
1 changed files with 16 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -421,6 +421,22 @@ static int
dump_freeobjects(dmu_sendarg_t *dsp, uint64_t firstobj, uint64_t numobjs)
{
struct drr_freeobjects *drrfo = &(dsp->dsa_drr->drr_u.drr_freeobjects);
uint64_t maxobj = DNODES_PER_BLOCK *
(DMU_META_DNODE(dsp->dsa_os)->dn_maxblkid + 1);
/*
* ZoL < 0.7 does not handle large FREEOBJECTS records correctly,
* leading to zfs recv never completing. to avoid this issue, don't
* send FREEOBJECTS records for object IDs which cannot exist on the
* receiving side.
*/
if (maxobj > 0) {
if (maxobj < firstobj)
return (0);
if (maxobj < firstobj + numobjs)
numobjs = maxobj - firstobj;
}
/*
* If there is a pending op, but it's not PENDING_FREEOBJECTS,