Explicit integer promotion for bit shift operations

Explicitly promote variables to correct type. Undefined behavior is
reported because length of int is not well defined by C standard.

Issue #4883

Signed-off-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Gvozden Neskovic 2016-09-02 15:07:00 +02:00 committed by Brian Behlendorf
parent 031d7c2fe6
commit 4ca9c1de12
2 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ SHA256Transform(uint32_t *H, const uint8_t *cp)
uint32_t a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, t, T1, T2, W[64];
for (t = 0; t < 16; t++, cp += 4)
W[t] = (cp[0] << 24) | (cp[1] << 16) | (cp[2] << 8) | cp[3];
W[t] = ((uint32_t)cp[0] << 24) | ((uint32_t)cp[1] << 16) |
((uint32_t)cp[2] << 8) | (uint32_t)cp[3];
for (t = 16; t < 64; t++)
W[t] = sigma1(W[t - 2]) + W[t - 7] +

View File

@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ spa_tx_assign_add_nsecs(spa_t *spa, uint64_t nsecs)
spa_stats_history_t *ssh = &spa->spa_stats.tx_assign_histogram;
uint64_t idx = 0;
while (((1 << idx) < nsecs) && (idx < ssh->size - 1))
while (((1ULL << idx) < nsecs) && (idx < ssh->size - 1))
idx++;
atomic_inc_64(&((kstat_named_t *)ssh->private)[idx].value.ui64);