Archive-Team
/
zfs
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases 103 Wiki Activity

Linux 6.3 compat: writepage_t first arg struct folio* 

The type def of writepage_t in kernel 6.3 is changed to take
struct folio* as the first argument. We need to detect this
change and pass correct function to write_cache_pages().

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Youzhong Yang <yyang@mathworks.com>
Closes #14699
This commit is contained in:
youzhongyang 2023-04-05 13:01:38 -04:00 committed by Tony Hutter
parent 35d43ba8ea
commit 04305bbd18
3 changed files with 53 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
config/kernel-writepage_t.m4 Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
AC_DEFUN([ZFS_AC_KERNEL_SRC_WRITEPAGE_T], [
dnl #
dnl # 6.3 API change
dnl # The writepage_t function type now has its first argument as
dnl # struct folio* instead of struct page*
dnl #
ZFS_LINUX_TEST_SRC([writepage_t_folio], [
#include <linux/writeback.h>
int putpage(struct folio *folio,
struct writeback_control *wbc, void *data)
{ return 0; }
writepage_t func = putpage;
],[])
])
AC_DEFUN([ZFS_AC_KERNEL_WRITEPAGE_T], [
AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether int (*writepage_t)() takes struct folio*])
ZFS_LINUX_TEST_RESULT([writepage_t_folio], [
AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_WRITEPAGE_T_FOLIO, 1,
[int (*writepage_t)() takes struct folio*])
],[
AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
])
])

2
config/kernel.m4
View File

@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([ZFS_AC_KERNEL_TEST_SRC], [
ZFS_AC_KERNEL_SRC_ZERO_PAGE
ZFS_AC_KERNEL_SRC___COPY_FROM_USER_INATOMIC
ZFS_AC_KERNEL_SRC_FILEMAP
ZFS_AC_KERNEL_SRC_WRITEPAGE_T
case "$host_cpu" in
powerpc*)
ZFS_AC_KERNEL_SRC_CPU_HAS_FEATURE
@ -269,6 +270,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([ZFS_AC_KERNEL_TEST_RESULT], [
ZFS_AC_KERNEL_ZERO_PAGE
ZFS_AC_KERNEL___COPY_FROM_USER_INATOMIC
ZFS_AC_KERNEL_FILEMAP
ZFS_AC_KERNEL_WRITEPAGE_T
case "$host_cpu" in
powerpc*)
ZFS_AC_KERNEL_CPU_HAS_FEATURE

28
module/os/linux/zfs/zpl_file.c
View File

@ -729,6 +729,29 @@ zpl_putpage(struct page *pp, struct writeback_control *wbc, void *data)
return (0);
}
#ifdef HAVE_WRITEPAGE_T_FOLIO
static int
zpl_putfolio(struct folio *pp, struct writeback_control *wbc, void *data)
{
(void) zpl_putpage(&pp->page, wbc, data);
return (0);
}
#endif
static inline int
zpl_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
struct writeback_control *wbc, void *data)
{
int result;
#ifdef HAVE_WRITEPAGE_T_FOLIO
result = write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, zpl_putfolio, data);
#else
result = write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, zpl_putpage, data);
#endif
return (result);
}
static int
zpl_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
@ -752,7 +775,7 @@ zpl_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, struct writeback_control *wbc)
*/
boolean_t for_sync = (sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL);
wbc->sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE;
result = write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, zpl_putpage, &for_sync);
result = zpl_write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, &for_sync);
if (sync_mode != wbc->sync_mode) {
ZPL_ENTER(zfsvfs);
ZPL_VERIFY_ZP(zp);
@ -768,8 +791,7 @@ zpl_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, struct writeback_control *wbc)
* details). That being said, this is a no-op in most cases.
*/
wbc->sync_mode = sync_mode;
result = write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, zpl_putpage,
&for_sync);
result = zpl_write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, &for_sync);
}
return (result);
}