2008-12-05 19:32:34 +00:00
|
|
|
#!/bin/bash
|
2009-02-06 22:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Wrapper script for easily running a survey of zpios based tests
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. ./common.sh
|
|
|
|
PROG=zpios-survey.sh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
usage() {
|
|
|
|
cat << EOF
|
|
|
|
USAGE:
|
|
|
|
$0 [hvp] <-c config> <-t test>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION:
|
|
|
|
Helper script for easy zpios survey benchmarking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPTIONS:
|
|
|
|
-h Show this message
|
|
|
|
-v Verbose
|
|
|
|
-p Enable profiling
|
2009-07-24 15:50:05 +00:00
|
|
|
-c Zpool configuration
|
2009-02-06 22:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
-t Zpios test
|
2009-07-24 15:50:05 +00:00
|
|
|
-l Zpios survey log
|
2008-12-05 19:32:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-02-06 22:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EOF
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
print_header() {
|
2009-02-06 23:28:49 +00:00
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG} << EOF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
================================================================
|
|
|
|
Test: $1
|
|
|
|
EOF
|
2009-02-06 22:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Baseline performance for an out of the box config with no manual tuning.
|
|
|
|
# Ideally, we want everything to be automatically tuned for your system and
|
|
|
|
# for this to perform reasonably well.
|
|
|
|
zpios_survey_base() {
|
|
|
|
TEST_NAME="${ZPOOL_CONFIG}+${ZPIOS_TEST}+baseline"
|
|
|
|
print_header ${TEST_NAME}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
./zfs.sh ${VERBOSE_FLAG} | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
./zpios.sh ${VERBOSE_FLAG} -c ${ZPOOL_CONFIG} -t ${ZPIOS_TEST} | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
./zfs.sh -u ${VERBOSE_FLAG} | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2008-12-05 19:32:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Disable ZFS's prefetching. For some reason still not clear to me
|
|
|
|
# current prefetching policy is quite bad for a random workload.
|
2009-07-06 23:51:59 +00:00
|
|
|
# Allowing the algorithm to detect a random workload and not do
|
2009-02-06 22:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
# anything may be the way to address this issue.
|
|
|
|
zpios_survey_prefetch() {
|
|
|
|
TEST_NAME="${ZPOOL_CONFIG}+${ZPIOS_TEST}+prefetch"
|
|
|
|
print_header ${TEST_NAME}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
./zfs.sh ${VERBOSE_FLAG} \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
2009-07-24 15:50:05 +00:00
|
|
|
./zpios.sh ${VERBOSE_FLAG} -c ${ZPOOL_CONFIG} -t ${ZPIOS_TEST} \
|
|
|
|
-o "--noprefetch" | \
|
2009-02-06 22:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
./zfs.sh -u ${VERBOSE_FLAG} | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Simulating a zerocopy IO path should improve performance by freeing up
|
|
|
|
# lots of CPU which is wasted move data between buffers.
|
|
|
|
zpios_survey_zerocopy() {
|
|
|
|
TEST_NAME="${ZPOOL_CONFIG}+${ZPIOS_TEST}+zerocopy"
|
|
|
|
print_header ${TEST_NAME}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
./zfs.sh ${VERBOSE_FLAG} | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
./zpios.sh ${VERBOSE_FLAG} -c ${ZPOOL_CONFIG} -t ${ZPIOS_TEST} \
|
|
|
|
-o "--zerocopy" | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
./zfs.sh -u ${VERBOSE_FLAG} | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2008-12-05 19:32:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Disabling checksumming should show some (if small) improvement
|
|
|
|
# simply due to freeing up a modest amount of CPU.
|
2009-02-06 22:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
zpios_survey_checksum() {
|
|
|
|
TEST_NAME="${ZPOOL_CONFIG}+${ZPIOS_TEST}+checksum"
|
|
|
|
print_header ${TEST_NAME}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
./zfs.sh ${VERBOSE_FLAG} | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
./zpios.sh ${VERBOSE_FLAG} -c ${ZPOOL_CONFIG} -t ${ZPIOS_TEST} \
|
|
|
|
-s "set checksum=off" | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
./zfs.sh -u ${VERBOSE_FLAG} | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2008-12-05 19:32:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Increasing the pending IO depth also seems to improve things likely
|
2009-02-06 22:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
# at the expense of latency. This should be explored more because I'm
|
2008-12-05 19:32:34 +00:00
|
|
|
# seeing a much bigger impact there that I would have expected. There
|
|
|
|
# may be some low hanging fruit to be found here.
|
2009-02-06 22:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
zpios_survey_pending() {
|
|
|
|
TEST_NAME="${ZPOOL_CONFIG}+${ZPIOS_TEST}+pending"
|
|
|
|
print_header ${TEST_NAME}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
./zfs.sh ${VERBOSE_FLAG} \
|
|
|
|
zfs="zfs_vdev_max_pending=1024" | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
./zpios.sh ${VERBOSE_FLAG} -c ${ZPOOL_CONFIG} -t ${ZPIOS_TEST} | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
./zfs.sh -u ${VERBOSE_FLAG} | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2008-12-05 19:32:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# To avoid memory fragmentation issues our slab implementation can be
|
|
|
|
# based on a virtual address space. Interestingly, we take a pretty
|
|
|
|
# substantial performance penalty for this somewhere in the low level
|
|
|
|
# IO drivers. If we back the slab with kmem pages we see far better
|
|
|
|
# read performance numbers at the cost of memory fragmention and general
|
|
|
|
# system instability due to large allocations. This may be because of
|
|
|
|
# an optimization in the low level drivers due to the contigeous kmem
|
|
|
|
# based memory. This needs to be explained. The good news here is that
|
|
|
|
# with zerocopy interfaces added at the DMU layer we could gaurentee
|
|
|
|
# kmem based memory for a pool of pages.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# 0x100 = KMC_KMEM - Force kmem_* based slab
|
|
|
|
# 0x200 = KMC_VMEM - Force vmem_* based slab
|
2009-02-06 22:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
zpios_survey_kmem() {
|
|
|
|
TEST_NAME="${ZPOOL_CONFIG}+${ZPIOS_TEST}+kmem"
|
|
|
|
print_header ${TEST_NAME}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
./zfs.sh ${VERBOSE_FLAG} \
|
|
|
|
zfs="zio_bulk_flags=0x100" | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
./zpios.sh ${VERBOSE_FLAG} -c ${ZPOOL_CONFIG} -t ${ZPIOS_TEST} | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
./zfs.sh -u ${VERBOSE_FLAG} | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Apply all possible turning concurrently to get a best case number
|
|
|
|
zpios_survey_all() {
|
|
|
|
TEST_NAME="${ZPOOL_CONFIG}+${ZPIOS_TEST}+all"
|
|
|
|
print_header ${TEST_NAME}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
./zfs.sh ${VERBOSE_FLAG} \
|
|
|
|
zfs="zfs_vdev_max_pending=1024" \
|
|
|
|
zfs="zio_bulk_flags=0x100" | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
./zpios.sh ${VERBOSE_FLAG} -c ${ZPOOL_CONFIG} -t ${ZPIOS_TEST} \
|
2009-07-06 23:51:59 +00:00
|
|
|
-o "--noprefetch --zerocopy" \
|
2009-02-06 22:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
-s "set checksum=off" | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
./zfs.sh -u ${VERBOSE_FLAG} | \
|
|
|
|
tee -a ${ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFILE=
|
|
|
|
ZPOOL_NAME=zpios-survey
|
|
|
|
ZPOOL_CONFIG=zpool-config.sh
|
|
|
|
ZPIOS_TEST=zpios-test.sh
|
|
|
|
ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG=/dev/null
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while getopts 'hvpc:t:l:' OPTION; do
|
|
|
|
case $OPTION in
|
|
|
|
h)
|
|
|
|
usage
|
|
|
|
exit 1
|
|
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
v)
|
|
|
|
VERBOSE=1
|
|
|
|
VERBOSE_FLAG="-v"
|
|
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
p)
|
|
|
|
PROFILE=1
|
|
|
|
PROFILE_FLAG="-p"
|
|
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
c)
|
|
|
|
ZPOOL_CONFIG=${OPTARG}
|
|
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
t)
|
|
|
|
ZPIOS_TEST=${OPTARG}
|
|
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
l)
|
|
|
|
ZPIOS_SURVEY_LOG=${OPTARG}
|
|
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
?)
|
|
|
|
usage
|
|
|
|
exit
|
|
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
esac
|
|
|
|
done
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if [ $(id -u) != 0 ]; then
|
2009-07-24 15:50:05 +00:00
|
|
|
die "Must run as root"
|
2009-02-06 22:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zpios_survey_base
|
|
|
|
zpios_survey_prefetch
|
|
|
|
zpios_survey_zerocopy
|
|
|
|
zpios_survey_checksum
|
|
|
|
zpios_survey_pending
|
|
|
|
zpios_survey_kmem
|
|
|
|
zpios_survey_all
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exit 0
|