Archive-Team
/
zfs
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases 103 Wiki Activity
zfs/Makefile.am

48 lines
1.4 KiB
Makefile
Raw Normal View History

Simplify rpm build rules, added config/rpm.am. Distro friendly changes such that the kernel modules are packaged seperately.
2009-07-01 21:37:44 +00:00
include $(top_srcdir)/config/rpm.am
Support custom build directories One of the neat tricks an autoconf style project is capable of is allow configurion/building in a directory other than the source directory. The major advantage to this is that you can build the project various different ways while making changes in a single source tree. For example, this project is designed to work on various different Linux distributions each of which work slightly differently. This means that changes need to verified on each of those supported distributions perferably before the change is committed to the public git repo. Using nfs and custom build directories makes this much easier. I now have a single source tree in nfs mounted on several different systems each running a supported distribution. When I make a change to the source base I suspect may break things I can concurrently build from the same source on all the systems each in their own subdirectory. wget -c http://github.com/downloads/behlendorf/spl/spl-x.y.z.tar.gz tar -xzf spl-x.y.z.tar.gz cd spl-x-y-z ------------------------- run concurrently ---------------------- <ubuntu system> <fedora system> <debian system> <rhel6 system> mkdir ubuntu mkdir fedora mkdir debian mkdir rhel6 cd ubuntu cd fedora cd debian cd rhel6 ../configure ../configure ../configure ../configure make make make make make check make check make check make check This is something the project has almost supported for a long time but finishing this support should save me lots of time.
2010-09-02 19:12:39 +00:00
include $(top_srcdir)/config/deb.am
include $(top_srcdir)/config/tgz.am
Simplify rpm build rules, added config/rpm.am. Distro friendly changes such that the kernel modules are packaged seperately.
2009-07-01 21:37:44 +00:00
Refresh RPM packaging Refresh the existing RPM packaging to conform to the 'Fedora Packaging Guidelines'. This includes adopting the kmods2 packaging standard which is used fod kmods distributed by rpmfusion for Fedora/RHEL. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines http://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2 While the spec files have been entirely rewritten from a user perspective the only major changes are: * The Fedora packages now have a build dependency on the rpmfusion repositories. The generic kmod packages also have a new dependency on kmodtool-1.22 but it is bundled with the source rpm so no additional packages are needed. * The kernel binary module packages have been renamed from spl-modules-* to kmod-spl-* as specificed by kmods2. * The is now a common kmod-spl-devel-* package in addition to the per-kernel devel packages. The common package contains the development headers while the per-kernel package contains kernel specific build products. Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #222
2013-02-08 19:02:08 +00:00
SUBDIRS = include rpm
Simplify rpm build rules, added config/rpm.am. Distro friendly changes such that the kernel modules are packaged seperately.
2009-07-01 21:37:44 +00:00
if CONFIG_USER
Do not use KERNEL_DIR env var in Makefile.am A Gentoo user reported an issue where the build system would attempt to recurse into the kernel source tree if KERNEL_DIR is set in the environment. KERNEL_DIR is an environment variable that is used when the kernel sources are in a non-standard location, so it is necessary to stop relying on it to prevent this issue. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433946 Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <ryao@cs.stonybrook.edu> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
2012-12-17 17:43:45 +00:00
SUBDIRS += lib cmd scripts
Simplify rpm build rules, added config/rpm.am. Distro friendly changes such that the kernel modules are packaged seperately.
2009-07-01 21:37:44 +00:00
endif
if CONFIG_KERNEL
Remove custom install-data-local for headers Rather than use a custom install target it is cleaner to define a 'kerneldir' and set 'kernel_HEADERS' appropriately. This allows us to leverage the standing configure install support. Additionally, I took this opertunity add the missing make files to the include subdirectories. Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
2013-02-13 22:01:00 +00:00
SUBDIRS += module
Change spl-kmod-devel install path Install the common spl kernel development headers under /usr/src/spl-<version>/ rather than in a kernel specific directory. The kernel specific build products such as spl_config.h and Modules.symvers are left installed under /usr/src/spl-<version>/<kernel>. This was done to be consistent with where dkms expects kernel module source to be packaged. It also allows for a common spl-kmod-devel package which includes the headers, and per-kernel spl-kmod-devel-<kernel> packages. Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
2013-02-20 21:58:05 +00:00
extradir = /usr/src/spl-$(VERSION)
extra_HEADERS = spl.release.in spl_config.h.in
kerneldir = /usr/src/spl-$(VERSION)/$(LINUX_VERSION)
nodist_kernel_HEADERS = spl.release spl_config.h module/$(LINUX_SYMBOLS)
Simplify rpm build rules, added config/rpm.am. Distro friendly changes such that the kernel modules are packaged seperately.
2009-07-01 21:37:44 +00:00
endif
Build system and packaging (RPM support) An update to the build system to properly support all commonly used Makefile targets these include: make all # Build everything make install # Install everything make clean # Clean up build products make distclean # Clean up everything make dist # Create package tarball make srpm # Create package source RPM make rpm # Create package binary RPMs make tags # Create ctags and etags for everything Extra care was taken to ensure that the source RPMs are fully rebuildable against Fedora/RHEL/Chaos kernels. To build binary RPMs from the source RPM for your system simply run: rpmbuild --rebuild spl-x.y.z-1.src.rpm This will produce two binary RPMs with correct 'requires' dependencies for your kernel. One will contain all spl modules and support utilities, the other is a devel package for compiling additional kernel modules which are dependant on the spl. spl-x.y.z-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm spl-devel-x.y.2-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm
2009-03-05 17:08:07 +00:00
Remove spl-x.y.z.zip creation in 'make dist' Do no create a spl-x.y.z.zip file as part of 'make dist'. Simply create the standard spl-x.y.z.tar.gz file.
2010-09-02 20:15:20 +00:00
AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = foreign
Refresh RPM packaging Refresh the existing RPM packaging to conform to the 'Fedora Packaging Guidelines'. This includes adopting the kmods2 packaging standard which is used fod kmods distributed by rpmfusion for Fedora/RHEL. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines http://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2 While the spec files have been entirely rewritten from a user perspective the only major changes are: * The Fedora packages now have a build dependency on the rpmfusion repositories. The generic kmod packages also have a new dependency on kmodtool-1.22 but it is bundled with the source rpm so no additional packages are needed. * The kernel binary module packages have been renamed from spl-modules-* to kmod-spl-* as specificed by kmods2. * The is now a common kmod-spl-devel-* package in addition to the per-kernel devel packages. The common package contains the development headers while the per-kernel package contains kernel specific build products. Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #222
2013-02-08 19:02:08 +00:00
EXTRA_DIST = autogen.sh META DISCLAIMER copy-builtin
Add Debian and Slackware style packaging via alien The long term fix for Debian and Slackware style packaging is to add native support for building these packages. Unfortunately, that is a large chunk of work I don't have time for right now. That said it would be nice to have at least basic packages for these distributions. As a quick short/medium term solution I've settled on using alien to convert the RPM packages to DEB or TGZ style packages. The build system has been updated with the following build targets which will first build RPM packages and then convert them as needed to the target package type: make rpm: Create .rpm packages make deb: Create .deb packages make tgz: Create .tgz packages make pkg: Create the right package type for your distribution The solution comes with lot of caveats and your mileage may vary. But basically the big limitations are that the resulting packages: 1) Will not have the correct dependency information. 2) Will not not include the kernel version in the release. 3) Will not handle all differences between distributions. But the resulting packages should be easy to install and remove from your system and take care of running 'depmod -a' and such. As I said at the top this is not the right long term solution. If any of the upstream distribution maintainers want to jump in and help do this right for their distribution I'd love the help.
2010-07-27 17:19:44 +00:00
EXTRA_DIST += config/config.awk config/rpm.am config/deb.am config/tgz.am
Initial commit. All spl source written up to this point wrapped in an initial reasonable autoconf style build system. This does not yet build but the configure system does appear to work properly and integrate with the kernel. Hopefully the next commit gets us back to a buildable version we can run the test suite against. git-svn-id: https://outreach.scidac.gov/svn/spl/trunk@1 7e1ea52c-4ff2-0310-8f11-9dd32ca42a1c
2008-02-26 20:36:04 +00:00
Build system and packaging (RPM support) An update to the build system to properly support all commonly used Makefile targets these include: make all # Build everything make install # Install everything make clean # Clean up build products make distclean # Clean up everything make dist # Create package tarball make srpm # Create package source RPM make rpm # Create package binary RPMs make tags # Create ctags and etags for everything Extra care was taken to ensure that the source RPMs are fully rebuildable against Fedora/RHEL/Chaos kernels. To build binary RPMs from the source RPM for your system simply run: rpmbuild --rebuild spl-x.y.z-1.src.rpm This will produce two binary RPMs with correct 'requires' dependencies for your kernel. One will contain all spl modules and support utilities, the other is a devel package for compiling additional kernel modules which are dependant on the spl. spl-x.y.z-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm spl-devel-x.y.2-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm
2009-03-05 17:08:07 +00:00
distclean-local::
-$(RM) -R autom4te*.cache
-find . \( -name SCCS -o -name BitKeeper -o -name .svn -o -name CVS \
-o -name .pc -o -name .hg -o -name .git \) -prune -o \
\( -name '*.orig' -o -name '*.rej' -o -name '*~' \
-o -name '*.bak' -o -name '#*#' -o -name '.*.orig' \
-o -name '.*.rej' -o -name 'aclocal.m4' -o -size 0 \
-o -name '*%' -o -name '.*.cmd' -o -name 'core' \
Ensure *.order and *.markers build products are removed by distclean rule.
2009-11-21 00:01:00 +00:00
-o -name 'Makefile' -o -name '$(LINUX_SYMBOLS)' \
-o -name '*.order' -o -name '*.markers' \) \
Build system and packaging (RPM support) An update to the build system to properly support all commonly used Makefile targets these include: make all # Build everything make install # Install everything make clean # Clean up build products make distclean # Clean up everything make dist # Create package tarball make srpm # Create package source RPM make rpm # Create package binary RPMs make tags # Create ctags and etags for everything Extra care was taken to ensure that the source RPMs are fully rebuildable against Fedora/RHEL/Chaos kernels. To build binary RPMs from the source RPM for your system simply run: rpmbuild --rebuild spl-x.y.z-1.src.rpm This will produce two binary RPMs with correct 'requires' dependencies for your kernel. One will contain all spl modules and support utilities, the other is a devel package for compiling additional kernel modules which are dependant on the spl. spl-x.y.z-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm spl-devel-x.y.2-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm
2009-03-05 17:08:07 +00:00
-type f -print | xargs $(RM)
ctags:
$(RM) $(top_srcdir)/tags
find $(top_srcdir) -name .git -prune -o -name '*.[hc]' | xargs ctags
etags:
$(RM) $(top_srcdir)/TAGS
find $(top_srcdir) -name .pc -prune -o -name '*.[hc]' | xargs etags -a
tags: ctags etags
Add Debian and Slackware style packaging via alien The long term fix for Debian and Slackware style packaging is to add native support for building these packages. Unfortunately, that is a large chunk of work I don't have time for right now. That said it would be nice to have at least basic packages for these distributions. As a quick short/medium term solution I've settled on using alien to convert the RPM packages to DEB or TGZ style packages. The build system has been updated with the following build targets which will first build RPM packages and then convert them as needed to the target package type: make rpm: Create .rpm packages make deb: Create .deb packages make tgz: Create .tgz packages make pkg: Create the right package type for your distribution The solution comes with lot of caveats and your mileage may vary. But basically the big limitations are that the resulting packages: 1) Will not have the correct dependency information. 2) Will not not include the kernel version in the release. 3) Will not handle all differences between distributions. But the resulting packages should be easy to install and remove from your system and take care of running 'depmod -a' and such. As I said at the top this is not the right long term solution. If any of the upstream distribution maintainers want to jump in and help do this right for their distribution I'd love the help.
2010-07-27 17:19:44 +00:00
pkg: @DEFAULT_PACKAGE@
Refresh RPM packaging Refresh the existing RPM packaging to conform to the 'Fedora Packaging Guidelines'. This includes adopting the kmods2 packaging standard which is used fod kmods distributed by rpmfusion for Fedora/RHEL. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines http://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2 While the spec files have been entirely rewritten from a user perspective the only major changes are: * The Fedora packages now have a build dependency on the rpmfusion repositories. The generic kmod packages also have a new dependency on kmodtool-1.22 but it is bundled with the source rpm so no additional packages are needed. * The kernel binary module packages have been renamed from spl-modules-* to kmod-spl-* as specificed by kmods2. * The is now a common kmod-spl-devel-* package in addition to the per-kernel devel packages. The common package contains the development headers while the per-kernel package contains kernel specific build products. Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #222
2013-02-08 19:02:08 +00:00
pkg-kmod: @DEFAULT_PACKAGE@-kmod
Add Debian and Slackware style packaging via alien The long term fix for Debian and Slackware style packaging is to add native support for building these packages. Unfortunately, that is a large chunk of work I don't have time for right now. That said it would be nice to have at least basic packages for these distributions. As a quick short/medium term solution I've settled on using alien to convert the RPM packages to DEB or TGZ style packages. The build system has been updated with the following build targets which will first build RPM packages and then convert them as needed to the target package type: make rpm: Create .rpm packages make deb: Create .deb packages make tgz: Create .tgz packages make pkg: Create the right package type for your distribution The solution comes with lot of caveats and your mileage may vary. But basically the big limitations are that the resulting packages: 1) Will not have the correct dependency information. 2) Will not not include the kernel version in the release. 3) Will not handle all differences between distributions. But the resulting packages should be easy to install and remove from your system and take care of running 'depmod -a' and such. As I said at the top this is not the right long term solution. If any of the upstream distribution maintainers want to jump in and help do this right for their distribution I'd love the help.
2010-07-27 17:19:44 +00:00
pkg-utils: @DEFAULT_PACKAGE@-utils